DOMA's Demise Opens Door for Tax Refunds for Some Same-Sex Couples

Private Client Alert

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as it violates the due process and equal protection clauses under the Constitution.  Edith Windsor brought the case,  United States v. Windsor,  after the death of her spouse, Thea Spyer.  Spyer's estate  was required to pay more than $363,000 in federal estate taxes related to the inheritance of her spouse's estate.   If allowed the same status as a heterosexual  spouse, Windsor would have qualified for an unlimited spousal deduction, and paid no federal estate taxes.  With the demise of DOMA, married same-sex couples who paid estate or gift tax on gifts or bequests between spouses may be able to claim a refund of the tax paid.  If you can potentially make a refund claim, you should file that claim as soon as possible.  

The part of DOMA that was struck down provided that the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.  As a result of the Windsor decision, anyone who is considered married under applicable state law will be treated as married for federal law purposes, including most provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.  (The Windsor case did not involve Section 2 of DOMA, which says that no state is required to recognize a same-sex marriage that occurred under the laws of another state.)  Since the issue is one of constitutional law, the invalidation of the definition of marriage in DOMA is effective retroactively.

The Internal Revenue Code limits the time to file a claim for refund.  In general, a claim for refund must be filed within 3 years of the date on which the return was due (including extensions), or within 2 years of the date of the payment of the tax, if that date is later.  Without action by Congress to change the applicable statute of limitations, claims filed beyond that date would be time barred.  Any person with this issue who could potentially make a claim for refund should file that claim as soon as possible.  

For more information, please contact:

Beth Shapiro Kaufman

Michael G. Pfeifer

About Caplin & Drysdale
For more than 45 years, Caplin & Drysdale has been a leading provider of a full range of tax, tax controversy, and related legal services to companies, organizations, and individuals throughout the United States and around the world. With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., the firm also provides counseling on matters relating to bankruptcy, creditors' rights, exempt organizations, employee benefits, private client services, corporate law, white collar defense, complex litigation, and political activity.

Washington, D.C. Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005

  New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor
New York, NY 10022

This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation

© 2013 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.


Related Practices/Industries

Jump to Page

We use cookies to make your experience of our website better. By continuing to browse this site you consent to the use of cookies. Please visit our Privacy Policy for more information.