Elizabeth Stevens Discusses Further Clarification on BEAT Rule with Bloomberg

04.16.2018
Bloomberg BNA

Tax practitioners have identified fixes they think are needed to clarify mistaken cross-references and vagaries in the new tax law, saying changes need to be made as soon as possible to avoid widespread confusion during the next filing season.

. . .

3. Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax Aggregation Rule

Treasury has broad authority to write regulations implementing the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) aggregation rule, which determines if companies with at least $500 million in annual gross receipts and base erosion payments that are at least 3 percent of their deductions are subject to the tax. But “it's not even 80 percent clear” what Congress intended in this rule, making it a strong candidate for further clarification, said Elizabeth J. Stevens, an associate at Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered.

The law is vague about which payments are included and how to aggregate income from various entities. [...] There are several ways to read the statute that don't seem right or consistent with congressional intent, Stevens said.

“It's not a model of clarity,” she said

For the full article, please visit Bloomberg’s website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “Most Wanted: Tax Pros’ Technical Corrections Wish List” by Laura Davison for Bloomberg BNA.

Attorneys

Related Practices/Industries

Jump to Page

We use cookies to make your experience of our website better. By continuing to browse this site you content to the use of cookies. Please visit our Privacy Policy for more information.