Skip to Main Content

Tax Notes Quotes David Rosenbloom: Challenging Outbound Transfers of Intangibles

April 17, 2017, Tax Notes

In several cases involving tax years 2005-2007, the IRS has unsuccessfully attempted to rewrite cost-sharing agreements and, in the alternative, argued that a transfer of foreign goodwill is covered by section 367(d). Effectively, the IRS argued that foreign goodwill is included in section 936(h)(3)(B) —the very question the drafters refused to answer in the final section 367(d) regulations. Readers, never go to court to find out what the law is. You might not like the answer.

Although Amazon was primarily a cost-sharing agreement case under the 1995 regulations, the court addressed the foreign goodwill question ( Inc. v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. No. 8 (2017)). In Amazonas in Veritas, the dispute was about the amount of the buy-in payment (Veritas Software Corp. v. Commissioner, 133 T.C. 297 (2009), nonacq.AOD 2010-005).

In a cost-sharing agreement, the buy-in payment covers the initial transfer of preexisting intangibles, while the cost-sharing payments cover the technology developed under the agreement. In Amazon, the government succeeded in getting the buy-in amount increased, but failed to have Veritas overturned on the law. As it had in Veritas, the government was essentially trying to retroactively apply the 2011 cost-sharing regulations’ platform contribution requirement to intangibles transfers that predated the rule changes.

. . .

“Each and every aspect of the cost-sharing saga seems like a self-inflicted wound,” said H. David Rosenbloom of Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered. The technique is intended as a safe harbor. It is not self-evident that it should be available at all, or that it should be governed by the arm’s-length method, or that the government cannot impose reasonable restrictions it wishes on its use.”

For the full article, please visit Tax Notes’ website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “Challenging Outbound Transfers of Intangibles” by Lee A. Sheppard for Tax Notes.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
295 Madison Avenue
12th Floor
New York, NY 10017


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)