Skip to Main Content

David Rosenbloom Talks to Law360 on Transfer Pricing Issues to be Explored at ABA Conference

October 2, 2018, Law360

With several questions unsettled for the new base erosion and anti-abuse tax, transfer pricing experts at the upcoming American Bar Association Section of Taxation meeting will explore issues such as how the provision applies to intercompany service charges bearing a markup.

. . .

According to David Rosenbloom of Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd., BEAT doesn’t override tax treaties. While Congress “said almost nothing about treaties,” what it did say in Section 59A is telling. The section says that payments subject to full withholding would be allowed as full deductions, and it cross-referenced the former Section 163(j), which stated that if payments are partially taxable they would be partially allowable.

Rosenbloom also drew an inference from the former alternative minimum tax, considered by Congress and the courts following its enactment in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The 1986 tax act “had a lot of stuff that conflicted with treaties,” he recalled, but the AMT was assumed by Congress and the courts to be covered by treaties.

In an August 2018 paper written with Fadi Shaheen, an associate professor at Rutgers Law School, Rosenbloom said BEAT is substantially similar to the AMT.

Rosenbloom and Fadi pointed to Cook v. U.S., in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that treaty overrides are not favored — and further that for a later statute to override a treaty, “Congress must express a clear intention to do so.”

. . .

Rosenbloom, however, said interpreting the BEAT provision to override the treaty just because it is later in time is too simplistic. In reality, courts will try very hard to square the provisions, he said.

Moreover, he contended, fears that the treaty will essentially gut BEAT are unfounded.

“There’s a lot of variety in situations,” Rosenbloom said. “There are still plenty of situations where you would get deductions disallowed under the BEAT.”

For the full article, please visit Law360’s website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “BEAT Markup, Treaty Issues Scheduled For Debate At ABA” by Molly Moses for Law360.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
295 Madison Avenue
12th Floor
New York, NY 10017


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)